Should wives submit?

BigQuestions-300x211Why do people resent the way Scripture portrays a wife as a keeper of the home who submits to her husband? (See: Titus 2:3-5)

Sadly the intended beauty of this requirement has been marred by distortions and maligned by misrepresentations. This is partly why we need a closer look at the Scriptural portrayal of a wife.

Please read through to the end where I highlight seven things submission does not mean.

When the nation’s largest Protestant denomination amended its documents to include a statement on the need for a wife to “submit graciously to the servant leadership of her husband,” it resulted in a significant media backlash. Even in the church many were outraged. 

So what should we conclude about the New Testament passage that says, “Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything” (Ephesians 5:22-40)?

When I perform weddings, if I use the “s” word in the bride’s declaration of intent, (asking, “Will you take John to be your lawful wedded husband, to live with him according to God’s ordinance? Will you submit to him as to the Lord?”), I usually hear whispers of dissent from the audience. Yet I’ve never heard any dissent when I ask a groom if he will love his bride “as Christ loved the church.”

Misguided notions about submission in marriage abound. Some picture a wife who allows her husband to order her around and force her to do whatever he demands. Although this was largely the way wives were viewed in the culture of New Testament times, it’s a profound violation of the biblical understanding of wives submitting to their husbands . 

In Scripture, marriage is viewed as a one-flesh relationship based on mutual self-giving love. It’s a covenant of companionship between two spiritually equal human beings. Yet this doesn’t mean that the relationship is without roles and roles in marriage do not diminish individual uniqueness, equality and the call for mutual respect.

Some husbands foolishly misuse Christian teaching about headship and submission to diminish the uniqueness and contributions of their wives. These men typically insist that life conforms to their dominant identity so they can get what they want. 

I’ve also observed women who suppress their identity under more dominant men who frankly need the gifts and strengths of their wives. These wives entertain misguided understandings of headship and submission. They often end up enabling their husbands while wrongly thinking that they’re being submissive wives. They violate the original design of being the complementary completion to men who need the unique contributions of their wives. 

The original plan for marriage assumes the necessity of individuality and uniqueness in husbands and wives for completion of combined oneness. Think about it. If it wasn’t good for the man to be alone, it won’t resolve matters if a wife disappears into his identity. The unity sand offers a nice picture of two becoming one — without one disappearing into the other.

Whatever else oneness is meant to be in marriage, it’s not the disappearance of either part into the other but the merging of the uniqueness of each into one.

I realize that as sinners we all must resist the temptation of selfishly demanding our own way in relationships — especially in marriage. I also understand the tensions of give and take and how two people must be willing to honor each other above themselves. 

If each person is important to the strength of a marriage, each one must bring the beauty of their uniqueness and gifts to the relationship. It takes two for marriage to be what it is meant to be. 

According to scripture, the husband bears primary responsibility to lead the home in a God-glorifying manner. His leadership clearly involves authority and should be honored by his wife and family. This authority, however, should be based deeply in love (see: I Corinthians 13:4-8a) and thoughtful consideration (see: Philippians 2:3-5; I Peter 3:7

Scripture issues strong warnings against husbands who treat their wives with insensitivity (see I Peter 3:7). Husbands must never forget that they are commanded to love their wives as Christ loved the church (Ephesians 5:25). Cultural limitations should not be placed on this command any more than on the command for wives to submit to their husbands. 

It’s equally important to recognize what is not meant by submission of wives to husbands.

Consider some helpful distinctions about submission:

  1. Submission does not mean putting a husband in the place of Christ.
  2. Submission does not mean giving up independent thought.
  3. Submission does not mean a wife should give up efforts to influence and guide her husband.
  4. Submission does not mean a wife should give in to every demand of her husband.
  5. Submission is not based on lesser intelligence or competence.
  6. Submission does not mean being fearful or timid.
  7. Submission is not inconsistent with equality in Christ

(7 points from: “Recovering Biblical Manhood & Womanhood” ed. John Piper and Wayne Grudem)

Submission is most evidenced in a wife respecting her husband through her actions and speech. Wives must resist attitudes, tones of voice and facial expressions that convey disrespect. The same applies to the way husbands treat their wives! Husbands must act and speak in ways that encourage respectful responses from their wives. 

Oneness (as God intended) can only happen as each partner learns to live in harmony with the uniqueness of the other. Along these lines, I remind couples that playful rivalry is often part of this balance and keeps life interesting and engaging. But there’s a big difference between playful exchange and divisive or nasty rivalry. The latter is a sign of deeper trouble in the marriage.

Insecure and immature people make oneness in marriage very difficult because they are too focused on themselves and how others see them. They tend to approach relationships more as competition for attention and control — as divisive rivalry. They mostly want others to serve them.

The greatest prescription for practical oneness and for overcoming insecurity and immaturity is found in the powerful description of love in I Corinthians 13:4-8. Prayerfully revisit the great description of love in this passage and notice that it is especially anti-rivalry. 

See also: 

Steve Cornell

About Wisdomforlife

Just another worker in God's field.
This entry was posted in Divorce, Divorce and Remarriage, Equal Rights, Equality, Feminism, Marital Separation, Marriage, Roles in marriage, Submission, Wives, Women, Women's rights and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Should wives submit?

  1. Larry Geiger says:

    Submission starts with Jesus Christ. If you can’t, won’t, don’t understand that, then we can talk all day, all night, all week, all year about wives and husbands submitting and we will have just wasted our time.

    1. Submit to Christ.
    2. Submit to your spouse.

  2. Pingback: Should Wives Submit?

  3. Pingback: Weekend Links | The Faery Inn

  4. jonahnyoni says:

    It a great write! I think your followers can benefit from this article called: “10 things I should have known before I git married”

  5. Amanda Clare says:

    I wrote the following a year to two ago. A friend asked me to write some thoughts on leadership for a meeting she was to be having with the executives of her company. Her company was having some leadership/subordinate issues. I wrote for her, but as I wrote about leaders and subordinates, all I could hear in my head was ‘husband and wife’ and I knew that I needed to adapt it and post it as a blog on rolls in marriage. I never did that. The following is what I wrote. I omitted the parts that were strictly corporate world and changed the verbiage to marriage related terms, so it’s choppy and unfinished, but I think it’s a beautiful picture of rolls in marriage. Maybe I’ll finally finish it 😉

    “When two people perform the Waltz together it can be magnificent. A true art. But it can also be a clumsy disaster. For the Waltz to be executed flawlessly there must be a “Lead” and a “Follow”. If both partners choose to lead or both to follow, they will stumble and clash awkwardly throughout the number. But…if both partners know their roles the results can be breathtaking.

    Marriage is an art; a dance that people of all cultures, countries, and communities have engaged in since the beginning of time. Sometimes the journey is painful and awkward and sometimes it’s flawless.

    A true leader doesn’t aspire to greatness alone but seeks to share greatness with the one he leads. Does not the dance partner display as much talent and receive as much praise as the Lead? And does not the Lead share the dance equally with her, knowing that without her the dance is wholly incomplete?

    There is a gross misunderstanding in our culture that seems to state that it is shameful to be submissive. Au contraire! Nothing could be further from the truth! The one who leads is not greater than the one who submits. They are simply different. And within their different identities, they must work perfectly alongside each other. The irony is that the greatest indicator of a person’s success will be in the other partner: the husband’s talents will be made evident by the ‘performance’ of his wife and the wife’s abilities will be made evident by the success of her husband. If a husband seeks to build himself up by making his wife look incapable, he himself is revealed to be incapable of leading, and vice versa.

    As we, together, imagine this couple dancing…they know that one is the Lead and the other, the Follow. But to the spectator, are they not so perfectly in sync that it’s almost impossible to tell one body from the next, let alone the Lead from the Follow? Yet, between themselves, they know that these roles exist. And if they act within their positions, one leading…one following…understanding each other’s hearts, dreams, attitudes, and goals, they will deliver the most spectacular performance the world has ever known. Not a dance to music, but a dance from which the music flows.”

  6. Thanks for reblogging this. Scripture tells us what we should do and it’s clear that part of a wife’s job is to respect her husband. However, rather than reminding wives to submit, it would be more helpful to advise wives on how to respect husbands who don’t love and respect (women need respect too!) them as they should. I believe this is the real scenario facing so many wives who want to honor God, but are not 50% of the ideal marriage described in the Bible. I’m single but I imagine it must be sheer agony to respect someone who is unloving and disrespectful.

  7. Pingback: Top 12 posts in the past year « WisdomForLife

  8. vanessa says:

    I think it is really sad that husbands that are suppose to be loving Godly leaders are using the Bible to defend the right to mistreat, “spank”, Discipline ground, beat their wives that they should be loving. Even more so I think it is sad that the wives are bowing down to take that king of negative treatment. It is sad over the past few days I have really researched the whole Christian Domestic Discipline topic I have read a lot about the wives who blog and they sound so sad and trapped in a hole where they cant seem to get out of it as Christian people we should be binding and praying against such acts IN TH NAME Of JESUS they call it Spanking in the name of Jesus… How sad

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s