Most plausible worldview

Sometimes I am asked why I believe in Christianity and choose to follow the Bible.

Although I am well-aware of arguments against Christianity and the Bible and of the popular misrepresentations of both, on objective and logical grounds, I cannot find an alternative worldview that corresponds with reality as comprehensively as the Christian worldview. 

This doesn’t mean that I find everything easy to understand or to explain.

Life is painfully complicated and parts of the Bible are difficult to comprehend.

Some biblical passages are written in cryptic prose; others are emotionally difficult to understand.

Some of the Bible must be understood based on divine concession to those living in pagan ancient near eastern cultures. Other parts are just beyond the reach of finite minds.

Yet none of these challenges  necessarily call into question the truthfulness of the text. 

I am comfortable acknowledging the possibility of truths beyond my intellectual reach. This is not an excuse, but a necessary admission no matter what worldview you follow. 

One compelling question

“What way of seeing things corresponds most with reality and does not contradict what I clearly know to be true?” Or, asked differently, “What seems most plausible in light of what we see and know about humanity, the observable world and its history?

I believe a Christian worldview offers the most logically consistent and plausibly realistic understanding of life and the world. It simply does the best job explaining the world we encounter each day. And it offers the best explanatory frame for the most extensive range of evidence in the world and in the human spirit.

Even more, it speaks in deeply satisfying ways to shared human intuitions about meaningful and hopeful existence. It specifically addresses universal human needs regarding matters like love, forgiveness and peace.

I realize that there are people who struggle with some of what is recorded in the Bible. Yet while there are some difficult parts of scripture, as a narrative, it overwhelmingly corresponds with the reality of the world.

The Bible begins with a Creator who is said to be responsible for all the things that we see around us. Since something cannot come from nothing, it makes sense that an intelligent Creator is behind everything.

This Creator is said to be responsible for things like light, day and night, waters, sky, land, vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees, stars, fish, birds, creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals. All of these correspond fittingly with reality for all people in all places at all times.

Arguments over a particular age for the earth are extraneous to the biblical text and are too often used as unnecessary diversions from the narrative.

I find the account of human beginnings in the book of Genesis most plausible for how we attribute to them (among the beings on the planet) a status of uniqueness and equality. The Creator deliberated within himself when he said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule…”

And, “So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them” (Genesis 1:26-27).

The narrative of biological evolution (for all it offers scientifically) cannot logically lead us to a hierarchy of material beings (beyond superiority in survival). Honest scientists know that it’s just outside of the scope of science to establish matters like ultimate origins, transcendent meaning and ordered morality.

Yet what we encounter in the world (and what the Declaration of Independence declared to be “self-evident”) is that, “all men are created equal.” No other account of human origins could logically lead to this declaration.

If you are unconvinced about uniqueness for humans, try putting a person in a cage at the Zoo for spectators to observe. Why is such a thought repulsive to us? 

But, one might protest, “We put many humans behind bars in prisons!”

Yes, and this verifies that human dignity is not our whole story — another main theme of Christian Scripture. Humans fell from their original greatness.

According to the biblical narrative, the Creator intended a “very good” world for us (Genesis 1:31). But his original provision was corrupted. Something good took a bad turn. We know with empirical certainty that the world is not the way it’s supposed to be.

Dignity is tainted with depravity. But we need a narrative that provides for both dignity and depravity.

Human heroism and benevolence are repeatedly off set by a darker side to the human spirit. If the morning paper isn’t sufficient for verifying this duality, a study of history will easily make the case.

Someone suggested that peace is that glorious moment in history when everyone stops to reload. The biblical account speaks with clarity about this reality.

The term “fallen” applied by theologians to describe humanity is fitting because it clearly captures what we know about the world and ourselves. We were meant for more (and we know it) but “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23).

The original glory of being made in the image of God has been corrupted in profound ways. The main story of the Bible is God’s redemptive love in seeking his fallen creation to forgive them and restore them to his image.

For these and many other reasons, I accept a biblical worldview. There is simply no other way of understanding the world that corresponds with reality as comprehensively as Christianity.

Steve Cornell
Senior pastor
Millersville Bible Church
58 West Frederick Street
Millersville, PA. 17551

About Wisdomforlife

Just another field worker in God's field.
This entry was posted in Anthropology, Apologetics, Atheism, Atheists, Bible, Christian worldview, Christianity, Worldview and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Most plausible worldview

  1. Pingback: Is the Bible consistent with reality? | WisdomForLife

  2. Pingback: Christian worldview in four main events « WisdomForLife

  3. Pingback: 5 Guidelines for Answering Tough Questions « WisdomForLife

  4. Pingback: Science cannot offer all the answers | Wisdomforlife

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s