Culture of honor vs. Culture of law

The virtue of honor once had a more prominent role in the everyday conduct of individual lives and communities in our nation. When people showed higher levels of honor for life and property, law and law I enforcememt played less of a role than it does today.

In the early days of our Country, the duty to honor others functioned as a healthy motive for restraining inappropriate and disrespectful behaviors. Honor, as a valued social virtue, was taught in the context of family life, mentored through parental example and reinforced through community expectation.

Honoring others means among other things that I treat them with a protective form of respect. It flourishes in humble hearts that place a high value on their fellow citizens. To harm another or to ruin his property is to dishonor him. Such actions imply a devaluing of others. Honor shares the company of virtues like gratitude, courtesy and respect. The disappearance of these virtues is evident everywhere in the cultural life of 21st century America.

This is where things begin to break down and liberty is put at risk. Absent the virtue-forming influences of family and wider cultural expectations, social authority in the form of law and punishment must enforce honor and respect. A culture lacking a shared value of honor, leads to expansive social authority over individual conduct. A culture of law, however, is not a good substitute for one of honor. Law is more of a consequential force than a positive culture shaping reality. Obviously, human flourishing cannot exist apart from some degree of law and law enforcement, but expansive law rarely provides the best context for such flourishing.

The undaunted American spirit of rugged individualism is often itself a great threat to a shared virtue of honor. When everyone does what is right in his own eyes and looks out for himself at the expense of others, society suffers and law enforcement increasingly steps in to regulate individual lives. The fact that America has put more of its citizens in prison than any other nation (1 out of every 100) should be cause for alarm. Our prisons are overcrowded and unable to be effective places for reform. Our legal system is weighed down and sluggish. Our families are dysfunctional and our tax burden only increases.

What should be done to correct this spiral toward social ruin? Increased government is the default mode of politicians but it has obviously not helped. Throwing more money at government programs simply prolongs the agony on the way to our inevitable demise.

The American experiment has taught us that a free society is the best context for human flourishing. But freedom itself cannot flourish without deeper commitments to personal and civic responsibilities that promote healthy social order. We cannot afford, therefore, to be indifferent to the need for virtue-forming influences through families and Churches. Without widely shared virtues like honor, narrowly defined self-interests will threaten our common good. Liberalism without virtue and character ultimately destroys itself.

I believe that Churches must renew their roles in the lives of families and communities for the common good of society. As Churches become the humble, redemptive and truth-telling communities of love that Jesus intended them to be, they will serve as surrogate families for redeemed people. The Church is directed to: “Be devoted to one another in brotherly love. Honor one another above yourselves” (Romans 12:10). In a pervasively dysfunctional society, regaining such a vision for the Church is not only a matter of obedience to the Lord, it may also be the best hope for our nation.

Steve Cornell
Senior pastor
Millersville Bible Church
58 West Frederick Street
Millersville, PA. 17551

About Wisdomforlife

Just another worker in God's field.
This entry was posted in Church, Church and State, Church growth, Culture, Culture of Honor, Law, Worldview. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Culture of honor vs. Culture of law

  1. Pingback: Culture of Honor vs. Culture of Law http… « Dr. Diane Hamilton's Blog

  2. Pingback: When tolerance backfires | A Time to Think

  3. One Busy Mom says:

    Thank you! May I quote you if necessary?

  4. Brian Cleere says:

    The Jerry SANDUSKY matter shows the need for a LAW (written) to break the pattern of family culture, protection. The definition of HONOR as it is applied within the context of the Ten Commandments permits a father (figure) extreme acts which while hurting an individual in the family protects the most basic human community. This underlying family culture (“it is none of your business” Joe Paterno) led to the allowance of criminal behavior as we define it today. Should sexual contact with a family member be permitted? !!! I think not, but breaking through this “family culture” is necessary to stop this behaviour. It is easy to write of “rugged individualism” without considering all aspects of no government and law and theneed to not allow rape and member within the family.

  5. Pingback: A closer look at tolerance |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s