Abortion talk: A false dilemma exposed

 

A false dilemma lies at the heart of abortion talk. It goes like this: Oppose abortion and you side with politics; support abortion and you side with the health and safety of women. Is it possible that the exact opposite of this is true? Perhaps those who oppose abortion side with the health and safety of women. What do the facts substantiate?  

The medical effects of abortion and post-abortion stress disorder clearly indicate that abortion is rarely a good health decision for a woman. In a congressional hearing on the impact of abortion, psychologist Wanda Franz stated, “Women who report negative after-effects from abortion know exactly what their problem is. They report horrible nightmares of children calling them from trash cans, of body parts, and blood. When they are reminded of the abortion, the women re-experienced it with terrible psychological pain … They feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the most natural of human activities — the role of being a mother.”  

Many women battle long term emotional and psychological damage because of profound regret about their abortion. Abortion proponents, who attribute these effects to induced guilt from religion and pro-life activists, trivialize the actual trauma these women endure. As a result, it is not surprising that the greatest measures of support for women facing post-abortion stress disorder comes from pro-life ministries. These ministries treat seriously the feelings of women rather than trivializing them.  

How long will we be duped by politically motivated deceptions? Defending abortion is not about protecting a women’s health. Should it bother us when an organization like Planned Parenthood (while prospering on the abortion industry) intentionally deceives people about the traumatic effects of abortion? The irrefutable fact is that abortion, as a procedure, and in its after effects, is not about the health and safety of women. It’s more about a culture of convenience, self-absorption and money.  

It’s frightening that a person’s “being wanted or planned” is the criterion of her right to life. Yet here is another source of blatant deception. Is the life of the fetus no more than a product of conception? When a woman chooses to terminate her pregnancy is she actually terminating the life of her baby? Why do we have laws related to fetal homicide? Why do Doctor’s perform fetal surgery on a baby in the womb? Consider the following facts: 

“Scientifically we are human beings by virtue of our genetic makeup. The human code in the chromosomes is there from the start. We are utterly different from monkeys or rats or elephants as soon as the chromosomes of egg and sperm meet.”

“At eight weeks, all the organs are present – brain functioning, heart pumping, liver making blood cells, kidney cleaning the fluids, fingerprints formed, etc. Yet almost all abortions happen later than this date.”

“Ultrasound has given a stunning window on the womb that shows the unborn at eight weeks sucking a thumb, recoiling from pricking, responding to sound. We can see the amazing pictures in Life Magazine or various books or Web pages.”

“There is a principle of justice that, when two legitimate rights conflict – say the woman’s right not to be pregnant, and the baby’s right not to be killed – the right that should be limited is the one that would do the most harm.” (Above facts from John Piper)

We must enact laws that would compassionately protect both the women facing unplanned pregnancies and their babies. But, until we accept the truth that induced abortion is both detrimental to the physical, emotional and psychological health of women and the deliberate destruction of an unborn child, such laws will be considered extremist.   

Steven W. Cornell

About Wisdomforlife

Just another worker in God's field.
This entry was posted in Abortion, Planned parenthood, Post-abortion, Sanctity of life and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Abortion talk: A false dilemma exposed

  1. Dawn says:

    Abortion has always been the crutch of our judicial system-not known for caring about the actual “rights” of women, but more how to draw the votes~
    Having gone through an abortion myself-I know that although it was tough, I don’t regret it-and never have any dreams of a “child” calling to me- I was abused and mistreated-the child would have been too~
    I am not against those who think that abortion is against the “god” they talk about-
    what I am against is others telling me what I can or cannot do with my body-
    If you dont believe in abortion-quite simply..don’t have one
    otherwise-be quiet and let ME do whats best for ME-
    I am tired of third party sources who are unwilling to hear any other opinion-tell me how their opinion is right~
    Fair is fair- if I listen to you…listen to me
    If I wasnt sure I wanted the abortion…I would’nt be here!

  2. Brandon says:

    First, don’t try to say that “abortions hurt women” without any actual data. How about an actual number of how many women deal with this “post-abortion stress disorder”? If it’s more than a few million, you might have a case. However, 300 women with this disorder is extremely insignificant, and doesn’t help your point along.

    Your facts:

    “Scientifically we are human beings by virtue of our genetic makeup. The human code in the chromosomes is there from the start. We are utterly different from monkeys or rats or elephants as soon as the chromosomes of egg and sperm meet.”

    Being a human is not a virtue.

    “At eight weeks, all the organs are present – brain functioning, heart pumping, liver making blood cells, kidney cleaning the fluids, fingerprints formed, etc. Yet almost all abortions happen later than this date.”

    No one takes this seriously. Humans kill flies, mosquitos, pheasants, chickens, pubic lice, and other humans, so why should these fetuses get special attention?

    “Ultrasound has given a stunning window on the womb that shows the unborn at eight weeks sucking a thumb, recoiling from pricking, responding to sound. We can see the amazing pictures in Life Magazine or various books or Web pages.”

    Not helping your case… all of the fetuses look the same way: revolting. I might vomit if I see one of them walking down the sidewalk.

    “There is a principle of justice that, when two legitimate rights conflict – say the woman’s right not to be pregnant, and the baby’s right not to be killed – the right that should be limited is the one that would do the most harm.”

    There’s no point in debating this… rights are, and always will be, fictional. Rights are supposed to be undisputed and always available, and I have found nothing that is undisputed and always available. Rights are not rights if they can be taken away, and they all have been taken away from at least one organism.

    Finally, who’s John Piper? Never heard of ‘im.

  3. Pingback: Why don’t atheists oppose abortion? « A Time to Think

Leave a Reply to Brandon Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s